A Resolver replacement must preserve the relationships the organisation uses across risks, controls, incidents, evidence, issues and remediation. Moving a register is easy; recreating the context behind an accepted risk is the consequential part.
What Resolver does well
Resolver Enterprise Risk Management connects enterprise and operational risk records. Its AI can help draft controls when exposure sits outside tolerance, while APIs and Workato support integrations. Humans still need to approve the assessment and response. Pricing depends on users, modules and implementation scope.
Best Resolver alternatives
| Alternative | Best when | Main tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Camms.Risk | Registers, appetite, controls and treatments need a focused ERM home | Product direction is now tied to Riskonnect |
| LogicGate | Configurable applications and workflow adaptability lead | More customer-owned design governance |
| Protecht | Operational risk, KRIs and incidents shape the program | Method and configuration need capable owners |
| Riskonnect | Multiple risk disciplines require an integrated platform | Broader scope and migration complexity |
| An owned risk operation | The assessment method and decision path are distinctive | Product operation and assurance become internal duties |
Require the same live scenario from each option, including an out-of-tolerance risk, control evidence, challenge, treatment, acceptance and a later audit reconstruction.
Free and open-source Resolver alternatives
Eramba has a free, open-source edition, but it is not a no-cost replica of Resolver's operational-risk boundary. Hosting, integration, security, upgrades and support remain with the adopter.
Resolver versus an owned risk operation
The owned boundary should include statements, objectives, owners, versioned scoring, inherent/residual/target exposure, controls, evidence, indicators, incidents, treatments, approvals and delegated acceptance. It needs immutable history, permissions, exports, reconciliation and tested restore.
Connect authoritative identity, finance, cyber, safety, insurance and legal records rather than copying them. AI may draft or summarise with citations; people decide scores, controls and accepted exposure.
Resolver migration checklist
Map taxonomies, calculations, records, controls, incidents, attachments, workflows, integrations, roles, reports and retention. Prove representative histories and reports in parallel, test least privilege, reconcile counts and totals, and prepare rollback.
Resolver replacement decision
Choose a suite when the connected risk-and-incident model remains useful. Own the operation when a narrower, inspectable decision record better fits the business. Do not trade connected evidence for an attractive but isolated workflow.
Continue with Best risk management software, Risk Assessment Workflow: how to automate it, and Why risk software sprawl grows when no system owns the complete risk decision.
Map the record before migration
Deep Discovery can define the Resolver authority map, migration controls and continuity evidence before cutover. Deep Discovery is currently available through a limited account-enabled rollout.
